Comparison of Federalist Papers Federalist 24 to United States Constitution (1997)

Comparison of Federalist Papers Federalist 24 to United States Constitution (1997)

Summary

Federalist Papers Federalist 24 has 15 lines, and 13% of them have weak matches at magnitude 10 to 14 in United States Constitution (1997). 87% of the lines have no match. On average, each line has 0.13 weak matches.

13

Federalist 24: 5

... a popular body, consisting of the representatives of the people periodically elected; and that instead of the provision he had supposed in favor of standing armies, there was to be found, in respect to this object, an important qualification even of the legislative discretion, in that clause which forbids the appropriation of money for the support of an army for any longer period than two years a precaution which, upon a nearer view of it, will appear to be a great and real security against the keeping up of troops without evident necessity.
13

Article 1 Section 8: 12

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
11

Federalist 24: 9

... only be increased, but would acquire a mixture of indignation, at the unexpected discovery, that these articles, instead of containing the prohibition he looked for, and though they had, with jealous circumspection, restricted the authority of the State legislatures in this particular, had not imposed a single restraint on that of the United States. If he happened to be a man of quick sensibility, or ardent temper, he could now no longer refrain from regarding these clamors as the dishonest artifices of a sinister and unprincipled opposition to a plan which ought at least to receive a fair and candid examination from all sincere lovers of ...
11

Article 1 Section 7: 2

Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it becomes a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree ...